Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

City repeals smoking ban (Austin, Texas)
AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF ^ | Friday, October 31, 2003 | Friday, October 31, 2003

Posted on 10/31/2003 5:16:03 AM PST by Arrowhead1952

Council allows smoking in bars and restaurants, considers smoke-free 'First Monday'


By Jeremy Schwartz

AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF

Friday, October 31, 2003

The Austin City Council on Thursday repealed a 5-month-old smoking ban that never went into effect, passing a revised ordinance that will allow smoking in restaurants and bars to continue.

Although Oct. 30, 2003, will be a dark day in the annals of the anti-smoking movement, city officials hope it will give birth to a healthy Austin tradition. As part of a last-minute round of horse trading before voting, council members instituted First Monday, a day during which they want all live music venues to offer an entire night of nonsmoking fun.

First Monday is based on the successful First Thursday concept, which brings revelry to the shops on South Congress on the first Thursday of each month.

The pilot program will start in February -- two months before the revised smoking ordinance kicks in -- and last for six months. Officials hope it will catch on and spread to busier and more profitable nights of the week.

Council Member Daryl Slusher, who voted against the revised smoking ordinance, suggested making it First Friday, which drew a round of guffaws from bar owners in attendance. Council Member Danny Thomas also opposed the revision.

First Monday won't have the force of law behind it, but John Wickham, who heads the Red River District Association, home to many of the city's live music venues, said he thinks most clubs will participate.

"This gives us an opportunity to explore (alternatives) on a more voluntary basis," he said. "If this is what it takes to (allow smoking on other nights), you'll see the live music community come out and support it."

Smoking ban proponents also applauded the idea, brokered by Council Member Betty Dunkerley, but that was all they were happy with.

"I think today is definitely a defeat in terms of the public health in the city of Austin," said Rodney Ahart, a representative with the American Cancer Society. Ahart said anti-smoking forces plan to be active in upcoming elections to try and swing future votes.

The elections of Mayor Will Wynn and Council Member Brewster McCracken shifted support on the council away from the ban approved by former Mayor Gus Garcia's regime in June.

The revised ordinance lets bar and restaurant owners allow smoking if they buy $300 annual permits that will fund enforcement and tobacco education. The permit was originally $100, but Slusher pushed to increase the fee, which will be re-evaluated after six months.

The council also voted to define bars as establishments that get at least 70 percent of their revenue from alcohol sales, a change favored by Council Member Raul Alvarez. Restaurants and establishments that don't reach that level must build fully enclosed smoking sections with separate ventilation systems if they want a smoking permit.

A draft ordinance put the cutoff at 51 percent. Bar owners are worried that Warehouse District establishments, which are primarily bars but offer large appetizer menus, will be forced to build smoking sections. Wynn theorized many places would serve less food to escape the definition.

Bar owners estimate that the higher cutoff could affect dozens of Austin nightspots.

The ordinance also requires 52 two-hour smoke-free sets at live music venues per year, but the number could be changed based on the results of the First Monday experiment.

The ordinance also left some bar owners confused in regards to all-ages shows because it prohibits anyone younger than 18 from entering a smoking-approved facility. Officials said that wrinkle could be worked out once the ordinance is implemented.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Miscellaneous; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 300annualpermits; austin; livemusicvenues; pufflist; smokingban; snokingbans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
Only in Austin. Kill an ordinance before it ever starts. Now everyone should know why the Austin slogan "Keep Austin Weird" fits this city.
1 posted on 10/31/2003 5:16:04 AM PST by Arrowhead1952
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952
Reversing laws that kill commerce will become a trend. This 'back to sanity' movement will sweep the country.
2 posted on 10/31/2003 5:58:16 AM PST by jmaroneps37 (Jersey GOP needs your help we can win back the Assembly two weeks to go, step forward)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *puff_list; SheLion; Gabz; Flurry; CSM; Max McGarrity
Puff
3 posted on 10/31/2003 6:09:24 AM PST by Just another Joe (FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952
Let freedom ring it's the will of the people not the will of the freaks.
4 posted on 10/31/2003 6:11:02 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37; Vaduz
This 'back to sanity' movement will sweep the country.

Hopefully, this will happen. We must take back the country, not listen to the "few activists" in every city that are trying to force their agenda down our throats.

5 posted on 10/31/2003 6:16:25 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (Ban dumbocRATs forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952
"I think today is definitely a defeat in terms of the public health in the city of Austin," said Rodney Ahart, a representative with the American Cancer Society.


What he meant to say was, "I think today is definitely a defeat in terms of public control in the city of Austin!"
6 posted on 10/31/2003 6:19:31 AM PST by CSM (Shame on me for attacking an unarmed person, a smoke gnatzie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952; Dog Gone; dtel
The revised ordinance lets bar and restaurant owners allow smoking if they buy $300 annual permits that will fund enforcement and tobacco education.

Dem-o-rats got more money to fund their friends non-profits.

7 posted on 10/31/2003 6:24:27 AM PST by razorback-bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952
They passed a law that would immediately ban all smoking. They then backed off a bit and passed a law that bans smoking in restaurants and bars that get less than 70% of their revenues from booze.

This isn't exactly a repeal of a law folks.

8 posted on 10/31/2003 6:28:20 AM PST by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952
So much for Gus' "Legacy". Why is it that democrats always want to leave a lasting scar on the public? To remind us how god aweful stupid they are? Or how stupid we are for voting them into office in the first place?

You should hear the goober from the Cancer Society talking on the radio about the "public good" and "community". I'm all for "community" and good things in public. Things like freedom of association, property Rights, personal expression. He sounds like a friggin' Nazi. Albiet one with a lisp.

Enough of this communitarian bulltripe these pantywaisted little gimps keep trying to shove down our throats. Next one gets tarred and feathered.

9 posted on 10/31/2003 6:30:16 AM PST by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
$300 permit and an inspection. Still shouldn't even be on the books, but better than a ban. We can work on getting the permit price eliminated.
10 posted on 10/31/2003 6:31:28 AM PST by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952
The revised ordinance lets bar and restaurant owners allow smoking if they buy $300 annual permits that will fund enforcement and tobacco education.

Sure, let the owners pay for just another "tax".

11 posted on 10/31/2003 6:35:01 AM PST by MissTargets (can't eat 'em, but love to shoot 'em)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CSM
What he meant to say was, "I think today is definitely a defeat in terms of public control in the city of Austin!"

You hit the nail on the head. This is the same city where they have the "Smart Growth" initative.

There was a "smoking gun" memo between the city council and the public transportation. They are trying to make the downtown streets for the followin uses:
1. Pedestrians
2. Bycicles
3. Delivery trucks
4. Public transportation
5. CARS

Does that make any sense? One of the silliest quotes I ever hear, came from one of the council members. She said, "If you are in a traffic jam in Austin, it is because you are in a car."

Talk about a rocket scientest - NOT!

12 posted on 10/31/2003 6:40:42 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (Ban dumbocRATs forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
Or how stupid we are for voting them into office in the first place?

When the TX RAT senators ran to NM, rather than face the redistricting issues, I wrote a scorching letter to Gonzo Barrientos (my non representing state senator) concerning his whining. The last sentence I wrote, went something like:

One last thing, you made my voting much harder. I will not vote a straight ticket anymore. Now, I will vote for ANYONE running against a democrat from now on.

I still have not gotten any response from him or his office, not that I ever expected one.

13 posted on 10/31/2003 7:01:14 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (Ban dumbocRATs forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37
One hopes.
14 posted on 10/31/2003 9:52:42 AM PST by metesky ("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert
Maine has had a lounge system for years. Lounge licenses allowed full smoking and until about five years ago were an additional $700 on top of the pouring license. They went to over $2000 for the last four or five years, but on 1/1/04 all restaurants and bars are smoke free.
15 posted on 10/31/2003 9:59:19 AM PST by metesky ("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
This isn't exactly a repeal of a law folks.

It's a little nudge in the direction of being civil to a large segment of smoking voters.

We don't want it all, just enough space to have a beer and a smoke out of the rain. Some virulent antis won't even grant us that.

16 posted on 10/31/2003 10:06:31 AM PST by metesky ("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952
Bump
17 posted on 10/31/2003 10:09:14 AM PST by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metesky
It's a little nudge in the direction of being civil to a large segment of smoking voters.

Can you spell incrementalism ? Once they get the 70% on board, how long before they demand the other 30% have a level playing field ?

18 posted on 10/31/2003 10:14:11 AM PST by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952
To meet the 70% watermark they need to increase drink prices and lower food prices. Or better yet, offer free food with a minimum drink puchase. I remember "buying" beer on sunday before the 2pm time by having the store offer "free 12 pack of beer" with the purchase of a $10 dozen of eggs. He was not "selling" the beer. Where there's a will there's a way.
19 posted on 10/31/2003 10:14:12 AM PST by Ron in Acreage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Don't start. Relax for one weekend, eh?
20 posted on 10/31/2003 10:17:15 AM PST by metesky ("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson